For starters, there’s no optical drive in the iMac anymore. Since a 5mm edge doesn’t leave room for much of anything, the iMac's other parts had to get shifted around a bit.
That part was weird, but it just goes to show how good-looking this thing is.
It’s incredibly sleek - almost every single person who saw it on my desk started stroking it absent-mindedly. It's not quite as light as the HDTV-like Vizio All-in-One PC, but it’s still thinner than most computer monitors you’ll find, and there’s, you know, a whole computer inside. It's almost an optical illusion, astonishingly thin if you look at it from the front but much fatter if you catch it at the wrong angle. Apple’s claim of it being 5mm thin is a bit misleading - the back bulges out from the razor-thin edges almost like an old CRT television, and in the center it’s about four times as thick. But it’s smaller, lighter, and thinner than ever. It’s still very much an iMac, with a big black bezel surrounding a big screen, an aluminum chin below with a glossy Apple logo in its center, and a tilting aluminum stand sticking out of the back.
#Mac mini review video software#
Software will get tuned and the chips will only improve.This year's iMac appears to have undergone the computer version of elective cosmetic surgery – it doesn’t look different, just better. If you can wait I would recommend waiting. Adobe is a bit buggy with certain features, Photoshop luckily works seamlessly, but Premiere even in the Beta is less ideal with some crashing and hangups with certain features. I’ve noticed issues with how it uses memory and working with Fusion was even worse.
Resolve is optimized, but the beta crashes. I mostly use DaVinci Resolve and various Adobe apps and that has not been as smooth sailing. My own personal experience does say that this is an ideal situation.
#Mac mini review video mac#
If you can get past the render times, the ability to actually edit in real or near-realtime with a Mac mini is incredible. That’s ages and likely it needing to power through tough raw footage and some H.265. Two minutes took nearly two and a half hours. Time for the render test! And here’s where it slows down dramatically. The early playback seems to be quite seamless before adding any edits yet. The raw is being processed into Canon Log 2 in Final Cut during playback. Ross loads the footage directly into FCP. 4K 10-bit HEVC 60p footage from Sony a7S III.He wants it to be using as much of the M1 chip’s potential for these tests. The other thing he does is make sure to turn off as many other apps as possible. He happens to be using a 16GB Mac mini – 16GB referring to the memory – and Final Cut Pro. Limited I/O compared to Intel offeringsĮven with those limitations, when all the software and hardware aligns, say you are using Final Cut, then the M1 Macs sing.Apps need to be optimized for M1 (Apple Silicon) chips.We will get more into those as we go through this, but the big points are this: How about we stretch it to its limit? Filmmaker Kevin Ross wanted to by taking some top-notch 4K and raw 8K clips and putting it through the M1 Mac mini.īefore we get into Ross’ results, I want to say as an M1 Mac mini owner that it is an incredibly powerful machine for video editing with some very big caveats. Everyone can now have a powerful editing computer on their desk without needing to spend tens of thousands of dollars. The real kicker is that the M1 Mac mini costs as little as $600 on sale and is crushing it with select video editing workflows. Apple says they are going to revolutionize their computers! This isn’t totally the truth, but there have been some impressive improvements and demos showing the M1 chip blazing through some tough applications and workflows. There’s a lot of talk about the M1 Mac mini.
0 kommentar(er)
